ABSTRACT
Respiratory muscles (RM) are a very important part of the respiratory system that enables pulmonary ventilation. This study aimed to assess the post-COVID-19 strength of RM by estimating maximum static inspiratory (MIP or PImax) and expiratory (MEP or PEmax) pressures and to identify the relationship between MIP and MEP and the parameters of lung function. We analyzed the data of 36 patients (72% male;median age 47 years) who underwent spirometry, and body plethysmography, diffusion test for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and measurement of MIP and MEF. The median time between the examinations and onset of COVID-19 was 142 days. The patients were divided into two subgroups. In subgroup 1, as registered with computed tomography, the median of the maximum lung tissue damage volume in the acute period was 27%, in subgroup 2 it reached 76%. The most common functional impairment was decreased DLCO, detected in 20 (55%) patients. Decreased MIP and MEP were observed in 5 and 11 patients, respectively. The subgroups did not differ significantly in MIP and MEP values, but decreased MIP was registered in the second subgroup more often (18%). There were identified no significant dependencies between MIP/MEP and the parameters of ventilation and pulmonary gas exchange. Thus, in patients after COVID-19, MIP and MEP were reduced in 14 and 31% of cases, respectively. It is reasonable to add RM tests to the COVID-19 patient examination plan in order to check them for dysfunction and carry out medical rehabilitation.Copyright © 2022 Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age - 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale. Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 - P0.1 <= 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 - > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters. Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.Copyright © Savushkina O.I. et al., 2023.
ABSTRACT
The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age – 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale. Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 – P0.1 ≤ 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 – > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters. Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values. © Savushkina O.I. et al., 2023.
ABSTRACT
The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age - 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale. Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 - P0.1 <= 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 - > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters. Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.Copyright © Savushkina O.I. et al., 2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Lung function disorders in patients with ankylosing spondylitis can be caused both by the disease itself and the side effect of the treatment. Aim. The aim was to investigate the lung function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and analyze its dynamics after COVID-19 on the example of clinical case. Material and methods. 29 patients were enrolled in the study. Spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion test was performed. In 1 patient the dynamics of parameters was analysed after COVID-19. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0. Quantitative data with a normal distribution were presented as the mean and standard deviation (m±σ). The data with different type of distribution were presented as the median and interquartile range (Me [Q1;Q3 ]). The differences between quantitative parameters were assessed by student's t-test for data with normal distribution and by the Wilcoxon test for data with different distribution. To assess the differences between qualitative parameters the Fisher's exact test was used. A value of p<0,05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results and discussion. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed. The predicted values of the European Community for Steel and Coal 1993 and the Global Lung function Initiative were used in the analysis. On average, no ventilation disorders were detected in the group. However, 7 (24%) patients had airway obstruction. Restriction and impaired lung diffusion capacity were detected in 3 (10%) and 12 (41%) patients using European Community for Steel and Coal 1993 predicted values system and in 2 (7%) and 6 (21%) patients using the Global Lung function Initiative predicted values system respectively. The differences were statistically significant. In clinical case, the previously established lung function disorders became more pronounced after COVID-19: ventilation capacity, total lung capacity, diffusion lung capacity decreased by 50%, 35%, 38% respectively. Conclusion. Lung function tests should be included in the examination plan of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis may have a more severe course of COVID-19. The system of the predicted values used should be presented in the medical report. © 2022, LLC "IMC" Modern Clinical Medicine. All rights reserved.